All case studies

Case study · Slots game studio · 2025

PixelGrid Games

Slots studio goes AI-native, design-first.

A 120-person slots studio with 60+ titles across 12 jurisdictions embedded AI across game design ops, math validation, and operator support — lab certification process unchanged.

At a glance

  • 120Headcount
  • 4 weeksEngagement
  • 8Pioneers
  • 60+Titles
  • 12Jurisdictions

The brief

AI inside the design loop, not around the certification process.

See how we did it
Abstract illustration

Cohort

  • C-level (CEO, CCO)2
  • Heads of Department4
  • AI pioneers8

Drawn from Game Design, Math, Tech, and Account Management — the four functions where studio output meets operator demand.

What the pioneers shipped

Five workflows that designers and ops actually use.

Want this for your team?

Math model validator

Sanity-checks RTP and volatility against design intent before a build goes to lab.

Operator integration copilot

Drafts integration QA checklists per operator's spec; account manager signs off.

Marketing asset generator

Drafts launch assets within brand consistency rules per title.

Tournament setup agent

Assembles tournament configs from operator briefs; LiveOps signs off before launch.

Crash analysis for live games

Categorises live-build incidents, drafts root-cause notes for engineering.

“Faster design, faster ops — same lab certification, untouched.”

Approach

Four weeks. Math validation untouched.

01 / 04Week 1

Discover

Mapped game pipeline from design brief to lab cert. Identified where AI assists design vs. where math integrity must remain human-authored.

02 / 04Week 2–3

Build

Pioneers built first cuts. Math team kept full control over RTP/volatility models — agents check, don't change.

03 / 04Week 3–4

Math validation

Three demos with Head of Math and lab QA. Every math-touching skill independently verified.

04 / 04Week 4+

Compound

Skills shipped to studio marketplace. New titles inherit the validated patterns from week one.

Impact · Year one

Outcomes leadership signed off on.

  • Annual savings

    €960K

    Across the engagement's first twelve months.

  • FTE optimized

    8

    Full-time equivalents freed for higher-leverage work.

  • Business satisfaction

    9.3 / 10

    Post-engagement leadership review.

Why it didn't go off the rails

Lab certification is non-negotiable.

Lab-certification process unchanged

Every build still goes through certification labs the same way. AI accelerates the run-up, not the gate.

No auto-deploy to production

Agents draft integration changes; release engineers ship.

Every math change reviewed

Math team reviews every model output that touches RTP or volatility. No exceptions.

Audit trail per title

Each title carries the agent log, math-team sign-off, and lab certification — three independent records.

Where to start

Book an org assessment.
Ninety minutes, no slides.

We'll spend an hour with your leadership team mapping where AI creates the most leverage in your operation — and what an overlay would look like in practice.